I saw a soccer match this morning which was really amazing. I think this is the first time that happens in a soccer match: Arsenal was leading 4-0 up to the second half .After the referee ejected one of Arsenal midfielder ,Dyaby.in the second half ,Castle hill tied the game 4-4 after the ejection of the Arsenal player .The referee gave castle hill 2 penalities.

Even with 10 players Arsenal should not let Castle hill tied the game;I blame Arsenal coach for this tie.After the referee ejected the arsenal midfielder ,the team lost control of the ball completely;they could not even waste time.Aresenal was lucky for during the prolongation castlehill could have scored another goal and won the match.There were 8 goals in the match.

After that the team that is at the bottom of the league beat Manchester United, the top team of the league by 2-1.Unbelievable.

GR, I will only quote the brilliant Adidas advertising:
Impossible is nothing.

I do remember that game in the 2008 edition of the Euro where Czech Republic had the lead 2-0 With 27 min. to play in the 2nd half and the turkish team make a wonderfull comeback winning the game 3-2. If I'm not wrong, their goalie was even expulsed of the game and they had already used their 3 subs'. One of their player had to be the goaltender for about5 min. I'm practicing my english so if you see some mistakes be it would be kind to correct me lol

Sorry ti neg your example is not the same as the match that I described.You know soccer enough to understand an advantage of 4 goals after the fist half is an advantage that is almost impossible to conquer even when the winning team is playing with 10 players.The Arsenal coach and the referee are to blame.after the castlehill team first goal ,Arsenal should try to keep the ball for the remainder of the match.The players lost control of the ball.I am not a soccer coach but defensive soccer doesn't mean sending the ball all the time away form your goal.you have to control the ball so your opponents can not mount an attack against your team.I have seen so many matches where a team which has a slim advantage 1-0 starts to play defensively too early .

I always hated this strategy in every sports, here in Quebec we call this " La Trappe ". From a fan view, it's not entertaining. Secondly Arsenal is a offensive team (Arshavin,Walcott,Van persie ,Nasri etc,etc) I'm questionning my self why Arsène Wenger did this?

I found something interesting here

http://www.footanglais365.com/premier-league/article_495916_Newcastle-Arsenal-Interpol-enquete.shtml

It is indeed very interesting because this match is very suspicious.As you said Arsenal is a very offensive team;I can understand why the coach replaced Walcott with a defender ,but this tchek player is not the best mildfielder in the Arsenal reserve.I don't understand the referee's decision to allow the second penalty.A referee should not sanction a fault that can cause a penalty when the attacking team is not in a position to score.I don't even thnk there was a fault.Interpol should also investigate the referee.