Forum Haiti : Des Idées et des Débats sur l'Avenir d'Haiti
Forum Haiti : Des Idées et des Débats sur l'Avenir d'Haiti
Forum Haiti : Des Idées et des Débats sur l'Avenir d'Haiti
Vous souhaitez réagir à ce message ? Créez un compte en quelques clics ou connectez-vous pour continuer.

Forum Haiti : Des Idées et des Débats sur l'Avenir d'Haiti

FOROM AYITI : Tèt Ansanm Pou'n Chanje Ayiti.
 
AccueilAccueil  GalerieGalerie  PortailPortail  ÉvènementsÉvènements  PublicationsPublications  RechercherRechercher  S'enregistrerS'enregistrer  Connexion  
-56%
Le deal à ne pas rater :
-56% sur le jeu MOTOGP 21 sur PC
20.59 € 47.19 €
Voir le deal
Le Deal du moment : -44%
Clé USB 3.0 SanDisk Ultra 128 Go (vitesse de ...
Voir le deal
18.89 €

 

 Defaite de Obamacare

Aller en bas 
2 participants
AuteurMessage
dilibon
Super Star
Super Star


Masculin
Nombre de messages : 2205
Localisation : Haiti
Opinion politique : Entrepreneur
Loisirs : Plages
Date d'inscription : 17/05/2009

Feuille de personnage
Jeu de rôle: Contributeur

Defaite de Obamacare Empty
MessageSujet: Defaite de Obamacare   Defaite de Obamacare EmptyVen 12 Aoû 2011 - 14:32

Appeals court rules against Obama healthcare law
By Jeremy Pelofsky and James Vicini | Reuters – 35 mins ago.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - An appeals court ruled Friday that President Barack Obama's healthcare law requiring Americans to buy healthcare insurance or face a penalty was unconstitutional, a blow to the White House.

The Appeals Court for the 11th Circuit, based in Atlanta, found that Congress exceeded its authority by requiring Americans to buy coverage, but also ruled that the rest of the wide-ranging law could remain in effect.

The legality of the so-called individual mandate, a cornerstone of the 2010 healthcare law, is widely expected to be decided by the Supreme Court. The Obama administration has defended the provision as constitutional.

The case stems from a challenge by 26 U.S. states which had argued the individual mandate, set to go into effect in 2014, was unconstitutional because Congress could not force Americans to buy health insurance or face the prospect of a penalty.

"This economic mandate represents a wholly novel and potentially unbounded assertion of congressional authority: the ability to compel Americans to purchase an expensive health insurance product they have elected not to buy, and to make them re-purchase that insurance product every month for their entire lives," a divided three-judge panel said.

Obama and his administration had pressed for the law to help halt the steep increases in healthcare costs and expand insurance coverage to the more than 30 million Americans who are without it.

It argued that the requirement was legal under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. One of the three judges of the appeals court panel, Stanley Marcus, agreed with the administration in dissenting from the majority opinion.

The majority "has ignored the undeniable fact that Congress' commerce power has grown exponentially over the past two centuries and is now generally accepted as having afforded Congress the authority to create rules regulating large areas of our national economy," Marcus wrote.

Many other provisions of the healthcare law are already being implemented.

The decision contrasts with one by the U.S. Appeals Court for the 6th Circuit, based in Cincinnati, which had upheld the individual mandate as constitutional. That case has already been appealed to the Supreme Court.

The Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, based in Richmond, has yet to rule on a separate challenge by the state of Virginia.
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
Le gros roseau
Super Star
Super Star


Masculin
Nombre de messages : 9664
Localisation : Usa
Loisirs : sport ,internet,stock market
Date d'inscription : 21/08/2010

Defaite de Obamacare Empty
MessageSujet: Re: Defaite de Obamacare   Defaite de Obamacare EmptyVen 12 Aoû 2011 - 15:07

This title is misleading.even if this ruling of the court of appeals were to be recognized by the U.S.Supreme court that doesn't mean that Obamacare is defeated..
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
dilibon
Super Star
Super Star


Masculin
Nombre de messages : 2205
Localisation : Haiti
Opinion politique : Entrepreneur
Loisirs : Plages
Date d'inscription : 17/05/2009

Feuille de personnage
Jeu de rôle: Contributeur

Defaite de Obamacare Empty
MessageSujet: Re: Defaite de Obamacare   Defaite de Obamacare EmptyVen 12 Aoû 2011 - 15:19

Le gros roseau a écrit:
This title is misleading.even if this ruling of the court of appeals were to be recognized by the U.S.Supreme court that doesn't mean that Obamacare is defeated..

Would you prefer "set back"? Alright so be it!
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
Le gros roseau
Super Star
Super Star


Masculin
Nombre de messages : 9664
Localisation : Usa
Loisirs : sport ,internet,stock market
Date d'inscription : 21/08/2010

Defaite de Obamacare Empty
MessageSujet: Re: Defaite de Obamacare   Defaite de Obamacare EmptyVen 12 Aoû 2011 - 15:21

Even "set back " is not appropriate because the appealing process is not finished .
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
dilibon
Super Star
Super Star


Masculin
Nombre de messages : 2205
Localisation : Haiti
Opinion politique : Entrepreneur
Loisirs : Plages
Date d'inscription : 17/05/2009

Feuille de personnage
Jeu de rôle: Contributeur

Defaite de Obamacare Empty
MessageSujet: Re: Defaite de Obamacare   Defaite de Obamacare EmptyVen 12 Aoû 2011 - 17:44

Le gros roseau a écrit:
Even "set back " is not appropriate because the appealing process is not finished .

Once this court has decided some states may choose not to enforce the law based on it alone! That is a set back. Some southern states have already opted for that a long time ago!
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
Contenu sponsorisé




Defaite de Obamacare Empty
MessageSujet: Re: Defaite de Obamacare   Defaite de Obamacare Empty

Revenir en haut Aller en bas
 
Defaite de Obamacare
Revenir en haut 
Page 1 sur 1

Permission de ce forum:Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Forum Haiti : Des Idées et des Débats sur l'Avenir d'Haiti :: Haiti :: Espace Haïti-
Sauter vers: